Kawasaki KLR Forum banner

1 - 20 of 48 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,481 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I keep thinking of the approach taken in many bike designs and wondering about applying to the KLR. Part of the issue is long suspension travel & such but the fact that it is easier to lift a dropped 680 pound Honda ST1100 than a 420 pound KLR is interesting....

One advantage to many bikes is that the fuel tank is placed lower in the bike. I keep thinking of the ST approach in which the carbs and air box sit in the fake tank (turtle shell) with the fuel sitting down behind the engine.

Anyone happen to have the air box and carb off a KLR and can take some dimensions & photos? I keep forgetting to do this when things are apart.

It would require a carb swap but how about a down draft carb with air box above and the fuel tank down in the frame?

The Honda fuel pump only requires 1.1 amps so that would be doable.
 

·
Lifetime Member
Joined
·
2,484 Posts
Could also go for one of those big Safari tanks... Big bucks, but if you only keep a few gallons of gas in it the fuel is held in the bottom of those huge wings, much lower than the stock fuel tank. Only bad part is that those tanks are stupid expensive for the 2nd gen bikes.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,481 Posts
Discussion Starter #4
Lowering links reduce ground clearance & "soften" rear spring action. They don't move the weight of the fuel lower within the bike's mass.

That said, and I know you were smiling when you said that, the "too much work" is certainly not overstatement. ;-)

We were talking about the idea at a friend's shop again today and I think I'll try placing some weight lower on the bike so get a feel for how a full tank might feel low down. Part of the decision regarding this will depend on whether an acquaintence decided he is willing to take part. Too much solo work but with some help and company....

I might have a line on a complete front end so that will take some attention.

It would be quite an advantage to have a full tank of fuel feel like a bike with an empty tank.




That sounds like way too much work. Why not just throw a lowering link on the rear shock?
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
411 Posts
Ever thought of a different bike? The design is what it is. You could go to a lot of effort for very little gain and even possibly negatively affect handling.
I love thinking out of the box too but alas, sometimes it is just cloud talk......
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,481 Posts
Discussion Starter #6
I'm not understanding what you intended by the statements. Likely only one cup of coffee so far...:ashamed0001:

While the design is what it is, I have 82 modifications done to this bike and 95 to the last one, not all duplicates. I've been part of maybe 20-30 mods to other bikes which don't overlap mine and there are many more others have done (such as PDwestman's oil system mods) which I have not undertaken.

I'm not arguing with your point that the KLR design has limitations but that's true of any system and the KLR does lend itself to significant improvement. Coincidentally though, a friend & I were talking along the same line as the point you made which shows that great minds think alike. Great minds = you + Dave....don't know that I could be included. :)

I think that your point, which is essentially that one should make a comprehensive plan as to one's intended finished product, is one which many of us fail to engage. Here's an example: I'm thinking of improving the front brake so could add the 320 mm rotor to the front wheel. I'm also considering improving the front forks which ultimately would require substituting superior front forks. I'm trying to decide just how far I wish to go with this because piece mealing might find me buying the rotor, then having to discarding the wheel because it's not compatible with the forks...then there's the speedo drive issue.

You've made a powerful point which is too often overlooked.

As for my bike: it's a very different equation than for most owners. Most people tell me that their primary or only interest is in riding. As time goes on, and I've had a motorcycle driver's license since 1965, more and more becomes "I've done it thousands of times + my body won't take that off road stuff in a way which is still fun." balance. I've always had a very high technical interest so the KLR is a test bed for learning and testing. I am responsible for quite a number of innovations because of that interest.

As for thinking outside the box versus cloud talk....hard to know how to respond to that because I'd have to know the standard/definition of the terms, "outside the box" and of "cloud talk". Often a concept which happens to appeal to one's own interests is accepted as positive while others are dismissed with disrespect.

I will use PDwestman's oil flow project because it is such a classic example. Any fair minded person reviewing the threads and hearing the back channel conversations would have to accept that he was the recipient of a lot of disrespect because some people were unwilling/unable to engage with the concepts which he advanced and to do this in a fair minded way. Some members of another group back channeled me in the attempt to engage me in criticizing someone who they were labeling "idiot". None of those people were prepared for my reaction; some came around; others are no longer on speaking terms. Laying aside that I like Paul very much for his (internet) personality and hope to meet in person at some time.

Even were this someone whose personality did not appeal, any fair minded person must accept that the concepts directed thinking in very new directions. I value that! Doing things over and over while expecting a different result/improvement is silly. The fact that Paul is risking his machinery and vacation time places me in his debt because he is spending the "coin" and then giving me the results.

If the nay-sayers had succeeded, we ... or maybe just me as I don't know who else is following the work...had succeeded in discouraging, then I would have been poorer.

Another side of this tetrahedron :) is that sometimes....no, in this group I choose "often" an idea which is floated will bring responses which turn out to be either more valuable or turn the original concept. I'd hope that this kind of "I feel comfortable in tossing out ideas here" can continue.

Don't know about others but I've bailed from several web groups because people are rude, intolerant, or dismissive of others. This group has been remarkably free of that which is why it is one of my two main KLR interests.

I usually play my cards fairly close in terms of advancing all that I know about a system so nothing makes my blood boil quicker than someone who clearly knows almost zip in comparison and takes it onto themself to become competitive as to who knows more. Just so there are no misunderstandings, nothing I have said is directed towards SkiBumBrian as will be clear to those who have read his posts.

I truly don't know where to draw the line on where is the border between outside the box and cloud talk but keep discovering that what I initially think is cloud talk by someone turns out to be very, very incisive.

Let's say, for example, that someone had suggested advancing the exhaust cam and dyno testing. I'll bet a box of donut holes that they'd have been laughed off several groups. How about raising thermostat temperature and installing a bypass? Laughter and ridicule.

I just metaphorically took a "puffer fish" buy the collar and straightened him out with regards the VRR effects from adding loads to a bike using shunt type VRR.

I'm engaged in diagnosing an ABS brake system which is throwing codes when a modulator which I recently serviced is installed. There's only one guy on this blue planet who is working with these systems and that came out of cloud talk...

I hear you, my friend but just don't know where to find that line.:fiddler:

As you can discern, I also wrestle with this issue quite a lot. Much of the success in my careers has been out of perhaps not being able to quite see that line...

Too bad I can't buy you pie & coffee as your thoughts would be very interesting and valuable. Please put me on your list if you are through this area and can spare some time.



Ever thought of a different bike? The design is what it is. You could go to a lot of effort for very little gain and even possibly negatively affect handling.
I love thinking out of the box too but alas, sometimes it is just cloud talk......
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
411 Posts
No disrespect intended Norm, sorry if it may have seemed that way. My KLR is highly modified as I am one who loves to "think out of the box" and am prone to cloud thought and talk. I enjoy people who push the envelope.
I have shaved over 30 lbs of my bike, extensive engine mods and installed a 44mm carb that nay sayers were saying would never work.... The CVK is on a shelf in the garage and I have never looked back.
I applaud your ideas and ingenuity but, as I always have to tell myself, "how far down the rabbit hole do you want to go?"
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,481 Posts
Discussion Starter #8
Slap me on the side of the head, SkiBumBrian! It never occurred to me that anyone would think that what you said was disrespectful. :t1204:

I should have tried harder to emphasize that I wasn't feeling disrespected in any way, especially by you.:(

If I had expressed feelings of being disrespected, I'd expect everyone to weigh in to tell me that I had to be misinterpreting what you said because that's not your style... Very, very sorry!

No, I was just talking in general. I sometimes forget that everyone else doesn't see this group as sitting with good friends and coffee. Throwing things out there is not personal and simply intended to learn what people I highly respect and trust think about something. Best way I know to find out if I' on or off track.

I never know where that magic line is located and, judging by over 30 years or marriage, not likely to discover.:fiddler: :)




No disrespect intended Norm, sorry if it may have seemed that way. My KLR is highly modified as I am one who loves to "think out of the box" and am prone to cloud thought and talk. I enjoy people who push the envelope.
I have shaved over 30 lbs of my bike, extensive engine mods and installed a 44mm carb that nay sayers were saying would never work.... The CVK is on a shelf in the garage and I have never looked back.
I applaud your ideas and ingenuity but, as I always have to tell myself, "how far down the rabbit hole do you want to go?"
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
8,352 Posts
Norm-

It might be that the way to come closest to your cg lowering goal would be install the IMS 10 gallon tank.

I'd have to measure (and will if it would be of help), but I think that 6 gallons in that tank would all be below the back bone of the frame.

I should have about 7 gallons in mine right now. Perhaps I'll take a measurement. There's also an overall weight loss since nerf bars are not required.

Tom
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,481 Posts
Discussion Starter #10
If you don't mind measuring, Tom, I'd be curious. I'd also be curious as to the effort to lift the bike from lying on its side to the vertical. One big issue is lifting these things as all will know. Even you big, young guys start to feel the strain when doing off-road but for a 5' 7", over 65...nasty. I only have a few lifts in me over a time interval and then risk hurting myself.

It's a real head shake that a 400 pound KLR650 is far harder to lift than an 800 pound Honda ST1100. Some people refer to the KLR as a "pig" but that's wrong, IMO. Pigs are short, compact, good in mud and water. The KLR is more like an elk, tall, heavy, small feet so no good at all in mud. Put a saddle and camping gear on Eric the Elk and you have the average KLR. Taking off the saddle helps a lot but if one can get the elk to keep his legs folded, it's far simpler to get him upright.

Part of the reason for the interest in lowering C of G is the lifting part. One of these days, I will remember when feeling ambitious (not a frequent intersection. VBG) and ratchet strap the front and rear to compress the shock springs. This lowers the leverage, road surface to C of G, which should make the bike easier to lift...or is my physics off target?

That might serve as an indication of the effects of lowering C of G....

I've not used a large enough pull scale to measure the lift weight with full and empty tank. It might be that the IMS tank is the simple solution...might be justification to buy one for those who have lifting issues?

The difference in having the ammo boxes holding the bike up a bit verus lying on its side is significant. Of course, once one passes the horizontal, the lift becomes much less.

Stuff to consider... hadn't even considered that tank. Thanks!
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
8,352 Posts
Norm -

I should have about 7 gallons remaining in this tank.

The bike is set up and as level as I could get it; it's just about ready to topple over.

The fuel surface is 36" above the ground and, for reference, the bolt that secures the side panel to the tank is sitting at 28 3/4" above the ground. I should think that 6 gallons would be about 2" lower.

I'm going to be doing some work on the bike in the near future - just got back from a longish ride and would like to check the change in valve clearance over the past 3000 miles. I may be able to drain the tank and re-fill it with 6 gallons. If I repeat the measurements that would give a more accurate comparison of fuel level to the stock tank. Of course, the tank can easily be ridden with as little as three gallons in it (said another way, enough fuel to safely ride 100 miles) to further lower the fuel level, but it becomes difficult to measure the fuel level accurately once the fuel goes below the slosh-over point. I'll see what I can come up with.

Someone with a white tank could do this far more easily...



edit: I've had some trouble getting a satisfactory picture that gives the right perspective of the fuel level. Click the photo to full size so you can easily see the markings on the tank and side panel.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
97 Posts
Norm,
You're like the Eric Buell of KLR's! What you describe with the ST sounds a lot like what BMW did with the F650. I had never thought of it from a C of G perspective but it would be interesting to know how much easier (if at all) it is to lift the Beemer vs. the KLR?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,481 Posts
Discussion Starter #13
It would be an interesting comparison.
Unfortunately that also compels me to bore you with my favorite BMW versus KLR experience. Some friends & I had come over from the Harrison Lake East FSR into the Nahatlatch and came out to have lunch at the Charles Hotel in Boston Bar, BC. We parked out front, to the east of a group of dual sports which looked to be getting ready to set off.

As I walked past, a guy standing with a 650 BMW dual sport made a rude comment to the effect that the KLR was a cheap piece of junk. Since we were face to face and he could have had no idea what medication I as supposed to be taking and wasn't, I was a bit surprised at his level of risk taking. :)

I turned to him and said, "It's better than having a girl's bike I'd be afraid to take off road." He was momentarily speechless and some of his buddies started to chuckle, then responded, "It will do anything your bike will do and better!"

I turned, walked back to the KLR, put one foot on the seat and pushed it over. "CRASH!!!" In that dry air it sounded like a pallet load of sheet metal roofing hitting the ground from about 20 feet. People at the gas stations across the highway turned to see what was the noise.

I walked back to him mildly retorted, "OK, your turn!"

He didn't know whether to poop or wind his watch. His mouth opened and closed several times while he made odd sounds, then he grabbed his gloves in one hand, shoved his helmet on, no strap, piled on his bike and roared off. His buddies were doubled over slapping their thighs and howling with laughter.

Walked back and stood the KLR back onto the side stand and had about the best tasting Chinese food I've ever eaten. Must admit, I wouldn't have pushed that BMW over either.




Norm,
You're like the Eric Buell of KLR's! What you describe with the ST sounds a lot like what BMW did with the F650. I had never thought of it from a C of G perspective but it would be interesting to know how much easier (if at all) it is to lift the Beemer vs. the KLR?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
97 Posts
That's about the best KLR story I have heard yet!

I'm shooting Cheerios out my nose - that was hilarious!
Thanks, I'm at work and needed a good laugh today!:LaughHard:

Cheers!
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,206 Posts
Way to go Normk! These putzes that have to put someone else down to feel better about themselves make me:Tongue2:.
On the fork thing, I installed a set of 2012 KXF 450 forKs on my 2003 It is a great mod and works well. If you want details let me know. I didn't buy them but Emig Racing makes KLR triples to do this mod. I didn't find that out till after mine were on.
Regards....justjeff
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,481 Posts
Discussion Starter #16
Did you use the KXF450 front wheel, caliper & rotor or swap in some of the KLR bits?

I've been looking over MX bikes at friends' shops and wonder if the rotor size might be a bit on the small side for sustained mountain highway use. This seems like a good way to discover whether that's a concern.






Way to go Normk! These putzes that have to put someone else down to feel better about themselves make me:Tongue2:.
On the fork thing, I installed a set of 2012 KXF 450 forKs on my 2003 It is a great mod and works well. If you want details let me know. I didn't buy them but Emig Racing makes KLR triples to do this mod. I didn't find that out till after mine were on.
Regards....justjeff
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
411 Posts
That story is priceless Norm. I beg to differ with their comment on the Beemer could do anything the KLR can do, and better.
I have a buddy that owns a Dakar, competes regularly in trials competition and is considered a very competent rider that shakes his head on what I have the KLR do. His nickname for me is "sideways fast". I have ridden his GS and would not trade him straight across. Might swap him for a day if we were doing slab all day though....:)
I am glad Tom is taking some numbers for you. I can definitely feel the difference when my IMS tank is full. If I am doing any technical riding I try not to fill the tank unless necessary. I am not sure if when the bike is sleeping the fuel in the tank would make much difference though...... maybe!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,481 Posts
Discussion Starter #18
I guess "Do anything" depends on one's interpretation. Not knowing how good a rider he was, I thought I'd stick to the low hanging fruit, so to speak. :)

Back when I used to ride with friends on MX bikes, several called me an animal for the places I took the KLR. It was "root, hog or die" though because dropping the thing might have meant leaving it there. One of the criteria I have for dual sport is that I need to be able to accept walking away from the bike if it goes over a bank or into a creek or lake. Although, if I get much older and creakier, the bike might walk away and leave me. :fiddler:

I can accept walking away and buying another KLR to keep riding but a $20,000 BMW or KTM would be ride stoppers. Retired and on fixed income, I couldn't think that was value. The other part, and most of those who own that expensive stuff resent hearing it, is that they are very expensive and unreliable to ride, IME.

Find me a 1980's Suzuki with shaft drive, or an old, abused Wing....almost any Japanese shaft drive and the drive is still going even though the rest of the bike may have melted away around it. Many BMW shaft drives are crap. There is no way a shaft drive on a modern bike, let alone one as pricey as those, should ever fail. Better stop before I say what I really think. :t1202: :stickpoke: :)

Time to run for cover in case someone doesn't think I'm 1/2 kidding.
 
1 - 20 of 48 Posts
Top